AI MODEL READ
CONFIRMED LINEUPSMIL vs CIN
Milwaukee Brewers at Cincinnati Reds
Friday, September 4, 2026
SIMULATION · ONE TRIAL, EVERY MARKET
Watch the model run this game.
One representative trial from the MIL @ CIN simulation — real per-AB batter, outcome, and score progression from the spine. Every game-level market updates in lock-step with each play.
FIELD
PITCH SEQUENCE
Sal Frelick (R) vs HP
OUTCOME DISTRIBUTION
Sal Frelick in this spot
BATTER PROPS · SAL FRELICK
PITCHER PROPS · HP
GAME MARKETS · LIVE
updating per event
MONEYLINE
CIN to win
TOTAL
Over 8.5
RUN LINE
CIN -1.5
TEAM TOTAL CIN
Over 4.5
FIRST 5 INN
CIN wins F5
event 1 / 87 · pitching
Every card on the board is a live read. As the game changes, the math changes with it — every prop, every market line, in real time. Cards turn green when they hit, red when they miss.
I · GAME-LEVEL MODEL
Win probability + total.
GAME WINNER
Cincinnati wins
5,000-TRIAL SIMULATION
sim-led read — sharp books close, not identical
II · MATCHUP BREAKDOWN
Who has the advantage tonight.
The same numbers our 5,000-trial sim ran on — starter quality, projected strikeouts, and every bat in both lineups — not opinions.
MIL STARTER
Shane Drohan
AVERAGE- 6.1
- PROJECTED Ks
- 98
- PITCHING+
GO-TO PITCHES
Watch out: Sinker is getting hit hard lately.
CIN STARTER
Rhett Lowder
SHAKY- 3.1
- PROJECTED Ks
- 93
- PITCHING+
GO-TO PITCHES
Rhett Lowder grades poor (Pitching+ 93) vs Shane Drohan grades avg (Pitching+ 98)
MIL LINEUP
1Sal Frelickhit 69% · HR 11%›
HIS PROJECTED LINE · FROM THE SIM
69%
1+ HIT
33%
2+ HITS
11%
HOME RUN
43%
2+ BASES
25%
3+ BASES
16%
4+ BASES
35%
RBI
12%
2+ RBIs
51%
SCORES A RUN
2Jake Bauers (L)hit 72% · HR 27%›
HIS PROJECTED LINE · FROM THE SIM
72%
1+ HIT
36%
2+ HITS
27%
HOME RUN
51%
2+ BASES
38%
3+ BASES
30%
4+ BASES
43%
RBI
21%
2+ RBIs
60%
SCORES A RUN
3Jackson Chourio (R)hit 76% · HR 25%HOT›
HIS PROJECTED LINE · FROM THE SIM
76%
1+ HIT
41%
2+ HITS
25%
HOME RUN
55%
2+ BASES
39%
3+ BASES
30%
4+ BASES
46%
RBI
24%
2+ RBIs
56%
SCORES A RUN
4Christian Yelich (L)hit 71% · HR 17%›
HIS PROJECTED LINE · FROM THE SIM
71%
1+ HIT
33%
2+ HITS
17%
HOME RUN
47%
2+ BASES
31%
3+ BASES
22%
4+ BASES
42%
RBI
20%
2+ RBIs
50%
SCORES A RUN
5William Contreras (R)hit 69% · HR 15%HOT›
HIS PROJECTED LINE · FROM THE SIM
69%
1+ HIT
33%
2+ HITS
15%
HOME RUN
44%
2+ BASES
27%
3+ BASES
19%
4+ BASES
41%
RBI
18%
2+ RBIs
45%
SCORES A RUN
6Brice Turang (L)hit 66% · HR 15%COLD›
HIS PROJECTED LINE · FROM THE SIM
66%
1+ HIT
28%
2+ HITS
15%
HOME RUN
41%
2+ BASES
26%
3+ BASES
18%
4+ BASES
36%
RBI
15%
2+ RBIs
49%
SCORES A RUN
7Garrett Mitchell (L)hit 71% · HR 15%COLD·UNLUCKY›
HIS PROJECTED LINE · FROM THE SIM
71%
1+ HIT
32%
2+ HITS
15%
HOME RUN
46%
2+ BASES
30%
3+ BASES
21%
4+ BASES
39%
RBI
18%
2+ RBIs
49%
SCORES A RUN
8Cooper Pratthit 66% · HR 10%›
HIS PROJECTED LINE · FROM THE SIM
66%
1+ HIT
28%
2+ HITS
10%
HOME RUN
39%
2+ BASES
22%
3+ BASES
14%
4+ BASES
38%
RBI
15%
2+ RBIs
42%
SCORES A RUN
9David Hamilton (L)hit 62% · HR 9%›
HIS PROJECTED LINE · FROM THE SIM
62%
1+ HIT
23%
2+ HITS
9%
HOME RUN
33%
2+ BASES
18%
3+ BASES
12%
4+ BASES
35%
RBI
13%
2+ RBIs
40%
SCORES A RUN
CIN LINEUP
1Dane Myers (R)hit 63% · HR 14%›
HIS PROJECTED LINE · FROM THE SIM
63%
1+ HIT
24%
2+ HITS
14%
HOME RUN
36%
2+ BASES
21%
3+ BASES
16%
4+ BASES
25%
RBI
8%
2+ RBIs
44%
SCORES A RUN
2Elly De La Cruz (S)hit 67% · HR 21%HOT·THIN›
HIS PROJECTED LINE · FROM THE SIM
67%
1+ HIT
29%
2+ HITS
21%
HOME RUN
45%
2+ BASES
31%
3+ BASES
25%
4+ BASES
34%
RBI
14%
2+ RBIs
48%
SCORES A RUN
3Sal Stewart (R)hit 66% · HR 22%HOT›
HIS PROJECTED LINE · FROM THE SIM
66%
1+ HIT
28%
2+ HITS
22%
HOME RUN
44%
2+ BASES
30%
3+ BASES
24%
4+ BASES
38%
RBI
17%
2+ RBIs
42%
SCORES A RUN
4Tyler Stephenson (R)hit 58% · HR 14%HOT·THIN›
HIS PROJECTED LINE · FROM THE SIM
58%
1+ HIT
19%
2+ HITS
14%
HOME RUN
35%
2+ BASES
22%
3+ BASES
16%
4+ BASES
30%
RBI
11%
2+ RBIs
36%
SCORES A RUN
5Eugenio Suárez (R)hit 55% · HR 19%›
HIS PROJECTED LINE · FROM THE SIM
55%
1+ HIT
17%
2+ HITS
19%
HOME RUN
35%
2+ BASES
24%
3+ BASES
19%
4+ BASES
31%
RBI
14%
2+ RBIs
36%
SCORES A RUN
6JJ Bleday (L)hit 55% · HR 17%COLD·UNLUCKY›
HIS PROJECTED LINE · FROM THE SIM
55%
1+ HIT
18%
2+ HITS
17%
HOME RUN
34%
2+ BASES
23%
3+ BASES
18%
4+ BASES
29%
RBI
12%
2+ RBIs
36%
SCORES A RUN
7Matt McLain (R)hit 50% · HR 13%COLD›
HIS PROJECTED LINE · FROM THE SIM
50%
1+ HIT
14%
2+ HITS
13%
HOME RUN
29%
2+ BASES
17%
3+ BASES
13%
4+ BASES
24%
RBI
9%
2+ RBIs
33%
SCORES A RUN
8Héctor Rodríguez (L)hit 54% · HR 15%›
HIS PROJECTED LINE · FROM THE SIM
54%
1+ HIT
16%
2+ HITS
15%
HOME RUN
31%
2+ BASES
20%
3+ BASES
16%
4+ BASES
27%
RBI
11%
2+ RBIs
32%
SCORES A RUN
9Edwin Arroyohit 52% · HR 6%COLD›
HIS PROJECTED LINE · FROM THE SIM
52%
1+ HIT
16%
2+ HITS
6%
HOME RUN
25%
2+ BASES
12%
3+ BASES
7%
4+ BASES
20%
RBI
5%
2+ RBIs
27%
SCORES A RUN
EDGE TIER · UNLOCK
Every bat, graded by the sim.
Both full lineups with per-hitter sim numbers — hit and HR odds, hot and cold form, and where the damage is likely to come from.
UPGRADE TO EDGE — $10/moIII · EVERY MARKET WE RAN
Swipe the whole board.
One card per hitter and pitcher, plus the game markets — the sim's own number on every line it priced, with the reasoning that produced it.
18 simulated lines · raw sim
1 / 2
Shane Drohan
MIL SP · vs. CIN
Strikeouts
5+ Ks
69%
Strikeouts
6+ Ks
49%
Strikeouts
7+ Ks
31%
Strikeouts
8+ Ks
17%
Strikeouts
9+ Ks
7%
Outs Recorded
15+ outs
89%
Outs Recorded
18+ outs
22%
Hits Allowed
5+ hits
55%
Hits Allowed
6+ hits
40%
THE READ
Middle-of-the-road strikeout projection at 5.5 Ks.
- Sim projects 5.5 strikeouts
- 69% to reach 5+ against CIN
Rhett Lowder
CIN SP · vs. MIL
Strikeouts
5+ Ks
19%
Strikeouts
6+ Ks
8%
Strikeouts
7+ Ks
3%
Strikeouts
8+ Ks
1%
Strikeouts
9+ Ks
0%
Outs Recorded
15+ outs
76%
Outs Recorded
18+ outs
15%
Hits Allowed
5+ hits
72%
Hits Allowed
6+ hits
59%
THE READ
Low-strikeout projection at 3.1 Ks — the ladder thins out fast above the first rung.
- Sim projects 3.1 strikeouts
- 19% to reach 5+ against MIL
IV · METHODOLOGY
How this read was built.
- Simulation. 5,000 Monte Carlo trials of this game using real play-by-play data, confirmed lineups, pitcher quality, bullpen depth, defensive runs saved, catcher framing, umpire K-zones, and per-batter rates regressed with empirical Bayes.
- What the number means. The share of those 5,000 trials in which the outcome happened — the model's own estimate, not a claim that a sportsbook has mispriced it. We publish it next to the reasoning that produced it and let the settlement record below speak for itself.
- Settlement. Every read on this page is graded by Kalshi's own settlement market once the game ends. The post-game version of this page shows what was confirmed and what was missed.
DISCLOSURE
BetFly is not a sportsbook, prediction market, or wagering operator. The model reads above are sabermetric simulation output — not advice or a recommendation on whether or how to bet. See our Disclaimer for the full risk disclosure.